Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a

The deprivation of fundamental needs has been growing in poorer countries rapidly. Most wealthy governments are saying that they need to help as much financial as possible to keep secure poorer countries from the inevitable economic crisis. In this essay, I will explain why solely providing money does not work, yet rich nations need to show pragmatism.

The major attribute that developed countries could assist poor countries in academic aid. If the government allows high numbers of students from developing countries to study free and with allowance in their country, the country would have potential and possibilities in the future. One girl from Syria had studied and graduated from Havard University, as she returned home country, she started a new journey with free education in her town. Therefore, it is certain that education could help the county in sustainable ways.

Furthermore, Finacial aid can be detained due to dirty politics and politicians. One of the notions that have been developed over the decades that poorer countries have awful politicians and do not have any idea about the utilization of resources. Countries like Nigeria, Haiti have received a huge amount of money from the international community, however, that was not used as it should be. Ultimately, that money went to politician's pockets. this evidence makes clear that it is better to choose other options rather than giving money.

To conclude, some politicians barricading money and put their pocket and that will diminish the general public's future. Moreover, other aid such as academics also helps poor countries develop. Therefore, I completely believe that financial aid does not work ultimately.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...that money went to politicians pockets. this evidence makes clear that it is better ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37078651685 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78213380063 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7100315238 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341102067458 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108613408181 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851846830716 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191766322059 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016530837448 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.