It is claimed that the money granted by developed countries could not handle completely poverty and the difficulties of destitute nations. Thus, different types of assistance should be delivered to poor countries rather than solely material incentives. Personally, I totally agree that richer countries should take more action in helping the poorer neighbours.
On the one hand, only financial assistance might never solve the problems of undeveloped countries. The first reason is that this aid is distributed from the government to the government, therefore, the needy residents can hardly receive their endowment, meanwhile, this money may be utilised inappropriately by unnecessary construction or illegal corruption. The second reason is that there are plenty of issues in poor countries that can not be dealt with money such as illiteracy or environmental pollution.
According to the two given reasons, not only money but especially actions should be taken seriously in order to help impoverished nations as well as to thrust the globalization. Firstly, charity organizations should prioritize education, which is the precursor of a civilized community. That said more teachers should dedicate their time and efforts to come and educate the poor citizens, more fundamental educational devices should be delivered. Secondly, developed countries should take environmental crises into earnest account for better public health and better global climate. Many pieces of research have shown that undeveloped countries always maintain the highest pollution rates, which damage the natural habitats of wild animals as well as the social health condition. Therefore, rich nations should consider instructing and helping the poor to preserve such an environment may be by "Three R's" or planting trees campaigns.
In conclusion, money is inevitable in some situations, especially in charity activities. Nevertheless, only financial aid given to poor nations can improve almost nothing, then, various assistant ways should be considered for a better world.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2000 and 2010 and by level of education for the year 2002 and 2010 73
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould be considered for a better world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77704918033 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06383574822 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5782781501 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271352318451 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935586411722 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064072437428 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172588647242 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947068532559 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.