Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, it is popular that wealthy countries help the less developed ones with financial funding. Nonetheless, in most cases, this does not save them from poverty. Consequently, many people suggest that developed countries should offer poorer countries other supplies instead of merely giving them money. Personally, I agree with this opinion and I will give arguments to support it in this essay.
To begin with, giving financial aid to undeveloped countries could be inefficient because they might not be able to utilise the funding. In order to promote economic growth, it is essential that a country possesses cutting-edge technologies that help them to enhance their production. Meanwhile, as poor countries tend not to have these technologies, it is difficult for them to invest the budget. Therefore, supporting them with scientific knowledge that can promote their industries would be more beneficial to them.
Furthermore, currently, developing countries are facing many immediate problems that money cannot solve. For instance, Cambodia is suffering from the COVID19 pandemic, making their medical system overloaded. Thus, it is crucial that they are supported with medicine, medical equipment, and vaccines from other countries, which would be extremely difficult to purchase at this time due to the supply shortage. Therefore, it is obvious that giving poor countries money could be uneffective in tackling their issues.
All in all, it can be seen that it is impossible to eliminate poverty only by giving undeveloped countries financial aid. In my opinion, poorer nations need various types of support in order to deal with their difficulties and keep pace with the developed ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 84
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live or study abroad 78
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...ng them money. Personally, I agree with this this opinion and I will give arguments to su...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in most cases, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46240601504 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86230489363 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0955112254 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326831361182 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122880771378 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101309468886 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209609031155 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546074709738 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.