Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Providing monetary support to undeveloped countries by developed nations has become increasingly popular. However, some people claim that financial aid can not mitigate their impoverishment and hence they should be given other types of help. This essay will argue why financial aid is entirely necessary for assisting poor countries despite some drawbacks.
People have always been sceptical that the government of poor nations would exploit the money provided by developed states. They hold the view that the authorities would use these funds in organising political campaigns and other governmental needs rather than investing in public education and health care services. For instance, in countries like Syria, the cash received from developed states is used in buying weapons and not for public necessities. These instances have instilled fear in public. On the other hand, reducing the cost of importing and exporting as well as encouraging industrial development would be more effective as it would lead to more employment opportunities. Thus it is clear that financial aid alone does not solve poverty.
Despite this, money is the most convenient way of assisting undeveloped nations. This cash can be used to develop educational and health care sectors. For example, if more public schools and hospitals are inaugurated then unprivileged citizens would have proper access to education and medical treatment. Consequently, illiteracy and lack of medical care would no longer be the reason for their poverty. Moreover, financial support can be very efficient when they are suffering from the after-effects of natural disasters. In these cases, funds can be used to rebuild infrastructures, regrow crops and provide clean water and sanitation to people. Therefore,it is apparent that monetary support is the most effective form of assistance.
To conclude, sometimes due to the exploitation of funds by politicians, it might not reduce impoverishment, but the benefits provided by monetary assistance is unrivalled. Hence, I completely disagree that other forms of help are better than money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below shows top ten countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantage of being self employed 11
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general 73
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 67
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... lead to more employment opportunities. Thus it is clear that financial aid alone do...
^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ater and sanitation to people. Therefore,it is apparent that monetary support is th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.584375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01625641058 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4861277873 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2777777778 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182466415956 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572057898012 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587116120998 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124804504545 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823603126608 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.