Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many developing countries received financial supports from developed ones. Some people argue that giving money to poorer countries is not a efficient method to help them. I consider it necessary that rich countries should offer advanced technology and education resources to those developed countries.
One benefit of supporting advanced technology is that the poor countries can apply these technology into essential industries such as agriculture and manufacture. Many developed countries suffer from poverty because they are not able to plant the crop in efficient ways. If the advanced agricultural skills can be introduced, those countries can improve their production of farming using by these technology instead of by human forces. Therefore, they can increase the yields each years, which solves the problem of hungry.
Local education quality can be improved when developed countries provided enough educational facilities and other supports. Thanks to the higher quality of education, local residents especially children can easily get knowledge, which support them to work for higher payment jobs. Moreover, education can help local kids study basic lessons such as math, which support them to study at university. Therefore, local people enable to improve their financial situations as personal efforts insteat of achieve money from others.
Although some people argue that giving money to poorer countries can quickly tackle poverty, this solution is not a long-term method. When rich countries put money into the poors, they are willing to buy foods and essential living materials firstly. However, those people tend to spend lasting money on other aspects. For example, those people who achieved money from the rich maybe choose to buy some expensive consumer products such as smartphones and computers.
In conclusion, giving financial aid to developing countries is a bed idea to help them. There are other types of supports such as technology and education that can help poorer countries tackle the poverty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically friendly Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...giving money to poorer countries is not a efficient method to help them. I consid...
^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...gy is that the poor countries can apply these technology into essential industries such as agric...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...ve their production of farming using by these technology instead of by human forces. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67157543344 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538709677419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7342804381 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.235294118 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326937774211 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127329207311 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938186392038 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231531397466 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120026343476 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.