Many folks think that affluent nations ought to permit jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from impoverished countries. I completely agree with the idea. This essay will discuss firstly the negative impacts of the movement of genius people to non-domestic nations, and secondly, the logic why the exodus is fruitful with relevant examples.
On one hand, there are increasing wastage of the native's resources when proficient people tend to go to foreign countries. For instance, the money drained on the primary, secondary and higher education of these experts is wasted from the nation's point of view when they migrate. Since the money completely goes to non-native nations, the migration leads to wastage of domestic assets unless the skilled people return to their countries. Next, owing to the increased exodus, the socioeconomic progress of a poor country is dramatically hampered. Take graduate engineers as an example. The majority of engineers go to abroad for post graduate studies which are usually research oriented, creating a serious shortage of intellectuals, and subsequently inhibiting the general fiscal advancement of the country.
However, i strongly consider that allowing jobs to creative people of poor countries by rich countries is extremely beneficial because of the following reasons. Firstly, people are able to find immense satisfactions as regards financial aspects. This can be exemplified by the fact that the exotic companies invariably offer much bigger pay packages as opposed to developing nations even with same qualifications and degrees. Moreover, the exchange rate is even considerably higher than that of under-privileged one's. Secondly, the establishment of strong social relationships is another remarkable benefit. With emigration, it grants the intermixing of two completely different cultures to generate a globalised society, which enables to remove the cultural boundaries between two nations, strengthening the interrelationships. In addition, the image of the accepting country can be boosted across the globe when the knowledgeable employees succeed. This ascertains why it is a positive development.
In conclusion, considering true contentments and advancements, wealthy countries need to approve jobs for talents from the counterpart.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain profession because of their gender? 76
- Some people believe that children's success in adulthood is related to the way they have been raised by their parents. Do you agree or disagree?Give your own opinion and examples. 55
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society.Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 76
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective. 45
- Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machines. Has it brought more advantages than disadvantages? 96
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1925 1500
No. of Different Words: 213 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.645 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.145 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 138 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.059 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.952 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.412 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.463 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.024 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... jobs for talents from the counterpart.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, as regards, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81818181818 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23937960211 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0507341762 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245205722934 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630781777071 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864408762611 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144481057428 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398104029779 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.