The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of the modern life style. What are the advantages of this trend? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people argue that the increase in the amount of fast food and premade meals has assisted people to stay in line with the speed of life. The major advantage of this is that such food indeed provides people with the opportunity to save time, while the main disadvantage, namely, the global health deterioration, can be significantly alleviated. I agree that the negative effects are not essential.
As people work more, less time is allocated for everyday chores like food preparation. Luckily, fast food was invented a few decades ago and since then has been supporting people in their work life in a form of ready meals or fast food restaurants. Since there is more free time, people might use it for either work more or spend leisure with their families. In the latter case, the happiness of the population increase, while in the former, salaries grow, which leads to the well-being of the whole country. For instance, one social survey showed that people who do not spend time cooking, have larger salaries because they save a few hours a day by eating junk food, thus they work more.
However, there is a major negative effect - the health of people who eat out every day may degrade over time. This is related to different adversarial components of junk food, which is inevitable consequence of convenience. For example, the statistics of the ministry of health and medical care in Russia has recently reported about evidence that people who eat fast food every day might be succumb to overweight. However, proper physical activity and constant medical watch might lessen this problem.
In conclusion, the growth in junk food consumption aids workers in their job or pastime, while the major drawback (health deterioration) might be alleviated by suitable routines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | Sergei_Bykov | 78 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requierement.To what extent do you think laws are needen to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 56
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requierement.To what extent do you think laws are needen to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.What is your opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99662162162 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64098437897 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7124937863 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175173425281 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631628184133 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527865256647 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107455596455 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736124914752 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.