Urban mobility is fast becoming challenge for many cities across world. The rising level of cojestions and different different types of pollution(air and water pollution) in cities is due to the rapid growth of personal vehicles such as private cars. To reduce this habit government should encourage the people to ise public transport more.
There are beneficial methods by which the use of public should be encouraged. First of fall, felt of buses to to be fuel_efficient government have to develop launch these buses, on time_arrivel and arrival should be managed. The older buses need to be replaced by by advanced technology buses which have air conditioning system, cushioned seats, sound-proof windows for safe and comfortable commute.
Furthermore, government should ban the old vehicles so the pollution will also be decrease. For example delhi bans cas which were manufactured before 2010.Main work is to provide smart cards, coupons and also give discount on these cards so the attracting towards public transport will be increased substantially.
In most of developed countries like paris,North America and Japan the infrastructure of roads is designed with advanced technology. The Paris is the best example of advanced technology lane system with functional public transport. Paris bans personal vehicles like cars and bikes in many historical places at weekends asa well as on special traditional events.
At last, I would like to say that the need of implementation of these incredible methods should be provided in those nations where the cost of fees of public transport is at it's peak level, the condition of roads is also too much rubbish. Growth of public transport, financial status, development of industries will also be increased.
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be made 78
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore somecertain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extentdo you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities Therefore somecertain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women To what extentdo you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: different
...rld. The rising level of cojestions and different different types of pollutionair and water polluti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ncouraged. First of fall, felt of buses to to be fuel_efficient government have to de...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: by
...ed. The older buses need to be replaced by by advanced technology buses which have ai...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Main
...cas which were manufactured before 2010.Main work is to provide smart cards, coupons...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , North
...n most of developed countries like paris,North America and Japan the infrastructure of...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (asa) must be used with a third-person verb: 'wells'.
Suggestion: wells
... many historical places at weekends asa well as on special traditional events. At l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36462093863 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94943859937 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5014510929 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.307692308 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17129286999 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612576476979 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401343252597 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902402367567 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488629437066 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.