Robots are increasing in operating in the industrialised world. On one hand, robots replaces people of dangerous or in unpleasant jobs for humans beings and robotic manipulators manufacturer products that are of higher quality and lower cost. On the other hand, some people think that robots can cause the loss of jobs.
Technology advancement has brought gigantic revolution in the method which utilise to operate the industrialised world. Moreover, it is considered by majority of people who substitution of robots with masses for detrimental or unnecessary jobs are beneficial for humans, whilst, others claims that robots are the big threat for masses to loss their works. However, this easy will shed light on both the perceptions along with my prospective.
One school of thought in the favour of former view the reason is that replacing robots with humans in harmful or in unpleasant works are better for people as some tasks are very difficult for masses to do such as collecting blood or nuclear samples in the laboratories. According to this, these tasks are required full potential at humans. In contrast, some people are careless to do that works which lead to lots of accident. Furthermore, robots are eligible to do that tasks very prudently . For example, it is a very daunting task to clean mines of oils which sometimes related to loss of life so in this case robots are suitable to do that works in the place of humans. The another factor is that robots are able to work around o’ clock as compared to masses because robots never feel tidiness to perform every tasks. As a result, they provide the vast amount of profits to businesses to produce large numbers of products with the help of robot’s fastest speed along with lower cost as well as the qualities of those products are very high than men made products.
The another school of thought in the support of later notion that robots are responsible factor for losing people’s job. To begin with reasons, the major is that robots could be perilous for unskilled workers because majority of companies replacing their old techniques with latest one. Due to these, industries give preference to machines rather than humans which great cause of unemployment in many regions. For instance, a local hotel in Kolkata which opened on 7 August 2019 launched robot waiter in the place of humans. Moving further, the another concerning area is that today people are very lazy so in this case they always dependent on machines for every little works in offices, houses and etcetera. Due to these, nowadays industries are hiring robots than humans the factor is that they never demand for salaries every month as well as honest and doing their works without any acceptances. So that is why it could be big threat for masses to loss their jobs.
In my opinion, robots are responsible to take place of humans which lead to loss human’s job. So , I think that robots are only performing those tasks for which they set otherwise they are useless. On the other hand, people have own brain which make they eligible to do every type of works. So that is why robots never take place of humans.
To conclude, Although, different people have different ideologies, yet , I believe that robots are good to do dangerous jobs but they never replace place of masses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Sanjpreet1008 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eligible to do that tasks very prudently . For example, it is a very daunting task...
^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ompanies replacing their old techniques with latest one. Due to these, industries give pref...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... which lead to loss human's job. So , I think that robots are only performing...
^^
Line 17, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt people have different ideologies, yet , I believe that robots are good to do da...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 7.30460921844 315% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 41.998997996 183% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2515.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 512.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.912109375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56045317179 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48828125 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9303219443 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.318181818 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22727272727 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358663962484 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106100942295 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619426704984 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210217500155 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253827120808 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.