The role of prisons should be to punish criminals, who have committed serious crimes. Training courses and education offered to prisoners are a waste of taxpayer’s money.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Present your ideas and opinions with examples where necessary.
In contemporary world, there are a number of people, who have not followed the laws had negative attitudes illegally, they ought to be punished. However, there is an argument that using taxes in order to train and educate them is waste citizen’s money. From my perspective, I not only completely disagree with this mentioned view, but also think governments should encourage to help criminals have normal life after punishment.
Firstly, the true meaning of educating is helping learners understand what is wrong and true. When adolescences did not have good environment for education, including school violence, bullying, having conflicts with parents, lack of quality curriculum, they are more likely to have disadvantage thinking and behaviors during growing up, that the main cause of being criminals. Moreover, in some articles, there are a few references show that developing nations such as African countries, where government have not paid their attention on upbringing children, have proportions of crimes are higher than developed ones. It is not hard to consider that educating is extremely necessary for criminals. After that, they could have better behaviors, lose their illegal thinking, understand what they did wrong in the past.
In addition, there is also a crucial problem for ex criminals who have just left from prison after a long time, looking after themselves by making money from having normal occupations is necessary. Even though, did incorrect things in the past, they deserve to have jobs which could do without making money by illegal ways. There are several solutions could be used such as organizing vocational courses, creating more manual jobs, which train them to have essential skills for their lives out of confining. That is also a part of human rights.
Taking everything in consideration, I concur that spending money for prisoners should be maintained in tax, and the more stimulation for this thing that governments provide, the more advantages that they could claim in a long way down the road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-22 | lethanhdatphumy | 84 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nals have normal life after punishment. Firstly, the true meaning of educating i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rstand what they did wrong in the past. In addition, there is also a crucial pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. That is also a part of human rights. Taking everything in consideration, I co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 217, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a long way" with adverb for "long"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e more advantages that they could claim in a long way down the road.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32923076923 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77223085354 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3179792588 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.230769231 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210914402279 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699569441656 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356433687025 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131292839596 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336431729308 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nals have normal life after punishment. Firstly, the true meaning of educating i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rstand what they did wrong in the past. In addition, there is also a crucial pro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. That is also a part of human rights. Taking everything in consideration, I co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 217, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a long way" with adverb for "long"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e more advantages that they could claim in a long way down the road.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32923076923 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77223085354 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3179792588 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.230769231 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210914402279 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699569441656 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356433687025 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131292839596 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336431729308 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.