Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes - the government or the people who build the houses.
There are many accidents claim thousands of lives related to a miscalculation in house construction in many countries. These accidents happen since there are no explicit rules of determining whose obligation is to impose construction safety standards; however, it has to be the government's commitment as it has necessary resources and power.
The government can enforce building codes in person of insurance companies. In many developed countries it is mandatory to insure properties, and in the event of damage to houses agencies compensate it. Consequently, to prevent the damage, happens mostly due to poor building standards, the government or its representatives should control the process of building since the beginning. Modern houses in Kazakhstan, for instance, are less likely to experience accidents due to the fact that the government monitors each building on safety standards by sending an inspector. This means of the enforcement, nevertheless, can be costly since the government has to employ a significant number of inspectors; this figure might be much more in countries where there is a building boom.
The safety standards can be enforced by the law. There is a criminal responsibility for violation the standards in many countries. This is more efficient in terms of resources as the owners become responsible for both properties and criminal records. Canada, for example, sentences those who have failed to conduct proper safety standards while building the houses for a long time and fines a substantial amount of money. Thus, the method can be both effective and efficient as the government's expenditure decreases on the inspectors, whereas, its income rises by fines.
Safety standards in building houses are vital. Thus, it is significant that the government be responsible for enforcing the standards since it is likely to be the only copable institute.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-26 | Khalsa kaur | 83 | view |
- Labour Arbitration Case between Canada Post Corporation and Canadian Union of Post Workers 67
- We are increasingly becoming dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of 89
- To solve ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? 84
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting. 93
- The first chart shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ty standards; however, it has to be the governments commitment as it has necessary resource...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'house'.
Suggestion: house
...operties, and in the event of damage to houses agencies compensate it. Consequently, t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... be both effective and efficient as the governments expenditure decreases on the inspectors...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15462942311 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513605442177 0.561755894193 91% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2347505135 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346070828038 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13182637168 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842976672823 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21870251735 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102334062555 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.