The next outbreak? We are not ready. Speaker: Bill Gates
Bill Gates commenced his speech with introducing the most worrisome disaster of the previous century – nuclear war. Some Americans used to preserve barrels of canned food and hide in basements in case of nuclear threat. Nevertheless, these days viruses and microbes are far more dangerous than nuclear bombs, according to the speaker. Also, Mr. Gates affirmed humanity is not ready for such pandemics as Ebola and any other viruses unless some preventive actions are taken.
The speaker provided an example of virus Ebola which killed over 10,000 people within a year and half when there was an outbreak in Africa few years ago. This was a global failure since treatments were delayed and there were not enough skilled personnel. However, Bill Gates stated that we are lucky due to the several factors that did not let Ebola spread all over the world; he mentioned first heroism of health workers, secondly he told about nature of the virus, which was Ebola failed to spread via air, and lastly the outbreak was not in an urban area. All these factors let the virus not to spread; nonetheless, humanity was not always that lucky since the speaker mentioned about the virus – Spanish Flu – which killed 33 million individuals all over the world in 1918. He, also, stated that the magnitude of Ebola disaster could have been worse, had the virus been similar to Spanish Flu.
The above examples are frightening, therefore, Mr. Gates proposed some preventive actions. He advised to strengthen health system so medical personnel would be ready for virus outbreaks. Also, the speaker suggested forming medical corps within armed forces. Thirdly, medicine and military have to be paired in order to respond swiftly to any disasters. Moreover, Bill Gates suggested creating different simulations and models of disasters so military and medical personnel had an opportunity to train. Lastly, Mr. Gates advised to enhance research and development facilities in order scientists could produce remedies to different kinds of viruses. Some people may consider these solutions money consuming; however, the speaker asserted that any global outbreak could have cost 3 trillion dollars and millions of casualties.
Bill gates concluded that we should start now to be ready for outbreaks.
- The charts show the percentage of British students at one university in England who are able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 70
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010. 67
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'strengthening'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: strengthening
...sed some preventive actions. He advised to strengthen health system so medical personnel woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'solutions'' or 'solution's'?
Suggestion: solutions'; solution's
...viruses. Some people may consider these solutions money consuming; however, the speaker a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18970189702 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48441355664 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7293702881 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.647058824 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201857598157 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620296924367 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055667703931 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140719654436 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416932313908 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.