School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions diverge on whether a foreign language should be selective in schools’ curriculum. Although some fervently advocate this sentiment, I am on the opposite side owing to students’ success and countries’ economy.
Admittedly, the future success of a student is attributed to encouraging bilingualism in children. During years at school, students' study progress can be improved forward. If students master a foreign language and have degrees, they can have chances to study abroad which brings to students a quality learning environment. After graduating, with foreign language degrees, they can win recruiters’ favor when applying to a company in this day and age. Due to globalization, the explosion of multinational companies lead to higher demand in recruiting biliterate employees. Therefore, the success rate of a student who studies a foreign language is greater than one who is language illiterate.
Further and even more importantly, the country’ economy can be refined if schools coerce their students into learning a second language. Conspicuously, now that students who study different languages stand better opportunities of pursuing tertiary education in abroad countries. After a long time being trained, overseas scholars can come back to their home country to work with professional virtuosity, so the economy will be improved. In some cases, they also send remittances home to family members; hence, that contributes to a thriving economy. In addition, the tourism industry is of paramount importance to the development of the country. This smokeless industry requires a numerous number of workers who are adept at languages. Thus, imposing this mandatory subject to learners is necessary.
By way of conclusion, a second language takes a pivotal role in students’ achievement and the country’s economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with 73
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 Units are measured in million tonnes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with foreign language degrees, they can win recruiters’ favor when applying to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65467625899 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17962009606 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4403071796 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138461877021 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467167501336 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570540467275 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878056658551 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458699359812 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.