In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how the school authorities could promote effective teaching practices and enhance educational quality. Some people suggest that one of the feasible ways to attain these two goals is to allow students to assess their teachers’ pedagogical performance, and I strongly subscribe to this view to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, students should be granted permission to carry out a proper evaluation of teachers’ performance, for this could spur teachers to improve on their weakness and update their knowledge in order to maintain their professional competence. For example, a science teacher, who is weak in mathematics, might be oblivious of his shortcoming, continuing to ignore this little foible in the absence of teacher assessment. However, a year-end evaluation done by students in an honest and polite manner could give this teacher an opportunity to identify his Achilles’ heel.
In addition, assessing teacher performance can help ascertain whether teachers fulfill their duty. As we know, teachers’ conscientiousness and devotion, together with their effective teaching, play a pivotal role in maximizing student engagement and learning. If teachers deliberately shirk responsibilities and muddle through their teaching jobs, this reckless attitude would adversely affect students’ academic performances. For instance, some irresponsible teachers get examination papers checked by students. Without reading students’ learning output, these lazy teachers cannot know what are still baffling their students, and neither can they know if they need to modify teaching methods. Nevertheless, the evaluation system, which protects students’ rights in the classroom, always reminds teachers to be respectful for their jobs because their attitude and performance are being examined by their students.
To recapitulate, the idea of appraising teachers’ performance is completely acceptable. Not only does this mechanism enhance teaching competence and help teachers foster a sense of responsibility but it also guarantees students the better quality of education. Therefore, I completely agree that schools should require students to evaluate their teachers in pursuit of high-caliber education.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 89
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What causes of the increased demand and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to this pr 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01818181818 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34392257414 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.516565654 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.857142857 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139116125401 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601725422768 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619044430389 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966562509583 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272695556993 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.