Throughout history, there has been considerable discussion about the exploitation of those working at the bottom of a company. Some people suggest that all workers, regardless of their positions, should be treated equally and given the same number of holidays, while others do not agree. From my perspective, people in a company should be treated differently.
Undeniably, the employee-friendly policy helps reduce financial loss, and the General Motors is a good example. The CEO of General Motors cannot endure to lose more than 20 billion dollars a year, so he and the company’s executives come up with a resolution strategy, which allows all employees to have the same number of holidays. Afterward, the company shows a turn from loss to profits because the employees are getting more motivation and working harder than before. However, this does not necessarily imply that all workers could have the same number of vacations in a year.
In fact, granting all employees the equal treatment might lead to the paralysis of companies because it messes up the work schedules. As we know, a company consists of many requisite divisions, such as sales department, marketing department, and purchasing department. The company cannot operate without any of these departments. If all people have the same days of annual leave, managers would have difficulty seeking substitutes who are competent for the jobs assigned. Therefore, it is very likely that there will not be enough people going to keep the company running.
In addition, different treatment for annual leave reflects the value of promotion and the commitment workers make. People will get incentives, if they become a leader of one division with more benefits above those of others. According to the data of University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, treating employees differently makes a significant difference to the increasing rate of capitalization. For example, the increasing rate of the company treating staff differently is twenty percent faster than that of the company treating staff with the same number of vacations. This is mainly due to the fact that it can stimulate people to compete, and this competition helps maximize the profits of the company.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely unacceptable. This practice leads to the breakdown of a company and encourages workers to show their potentials to their fullest. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- International tourism is now more common than ever before Some feel that this is a positive trend while others do not 89
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Dis 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32911392405 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98023828261 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546835443038 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4403346842 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330168325048 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940254049941 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848851254068 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181309975244 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633633564599 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.