It is often consider that researches done by scientists should be carried out and manage by governments instead of private companies. I completly disagree with this statement and without further speculation , I will dissect contrary views and bring forth my deduction.
Firstly, the primary reason is that private companies have almost zero political burden and those organisations work way better than companies owned by governments. My argument stands vindicated by the fact that 80% famous scientists abandon their government job to work under private institutions. In government labs, their officials are more corrupted and they are more curious about their job instead of researches. Despite of less salary, private companies provide more facilities for experiments. I believe, private sector has more convenient environment for scientists.
Secondly, private companies have plenty of funds to spend on researches so that they could reach destinations as fast as possible. Humongous financial balance helps them to invest more money in their projects because of that they can work in highly advance technologies. However, professionals lie to work on advance equipment. In other words, scientists reduce their workload by compiling datas on simulation so that they feel less stressful throughout their duty. Money will bring some advance software to secure their database and researches. Overall, financial support will help companies to continue their researches eventhough after few years.
To sum up, I believe there are some problems in government companies like corruption and lack of financial management. Instead of handing over to government , private companies must control scientific researches.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- Scientific researches should be the responsibility of governments rather than commercial organizations Do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tatement and without further speculation , I will dissect contrary views and bring...
^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t. Instead of handing over to government , private companies must control scientif...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74803149606 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97018879608 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3368179748 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110647744124 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378703229108 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476462443059 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089176074009 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780841254444 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.