Scientists and the new media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Government can not expected to solve this problem. It is the resposible of individuals to change thier lifestyle. What your view?
There are an increasingly of evidences of climate change. Beside some people who believe authority should take responsible for environmental problem, others argue that individuals should change their habits to save the Earth from further damage. Personally, I think that both authority and individuals should join together to tackle this issues.
Firstly, personal activities can make differences to environmental protection. By paying more attention on how to use energy, people can save significantly. For example, turning off the light or using solar energy, which help to reduce pressure on natural resources. Moreover, instead of using personal vehicles, choosing public transportations is effective way to save our planet. Because, public transportations do not release gas emission or C02, which can damage our atmosphere.
Secondly, authority play an indispensable role in fighting climate change. Some measures could only be taken by the government in stopping pollution in industry. Several studies show that industry account for a large proportion of greenhouse gas, therefore, introducing laws to limit the emission from companies is essential way to control air pollution. In addition, political system can invest more to green project such as building, business and so on. This activities can cut the pollution and promote sustainable development.
In conclusion, to success in combating climate change, not only government but also individuals should join hand to take action to save Earth.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-22 | linhthichhoc | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proportion of greenhouse gas, therefore, introducing laws to limit the emission f...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...t such as building, business and so on. This activities can cut the pollution and pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 225.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71555555556 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09333333333 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.675555555556 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7235343804 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147223967584 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484778215592 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330408361087 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855607451167 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306042783089 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.