Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is unveiled by researchers that casual automobiles will be replaced by driverless vehicles in the near future. Two major reasons stand out as responsible for this tendency, which may exert a double-edged impact on social betterment.
To begin with, the trend towards cars controlled by automation can be attributed to two contributing factors. Firstly, in many locals, where traffic flow has been denser, driving has become increasingly nerve-wracking, or even physically demanding. Therefore, since the desire of living a convenient life is inherent in our thoughts, the demand of computerized vehicles, which can significantly alleviate the burden residents suffer from in commuting, is heated. In addition, another reason stems from technological breakthroughs. In fact, recent advancements in branches such as robotic technology or artificial intelligent are believed to enable researchers to keep pace with public expectation by providing sufficient tools for accelerating their innovations.
In my opinion, while driverless vehicles can be beneficial, their drawback should not be overlooked. On the one hand, thanks to automatic cars, residents are able to make the most of their time. Specifically, since they have their vehicles driven by computers, social members can accomplish their tasks, participate in a video-conference or just entertaining during their journey duration, which cannot be reaped when casual cars are utilized. On the other hand, however, applying automation to commuting, transport system is thought to be more vulnerable to computer hackers. Indeed, it is foreseen that if a cyber attack happens, malfunctions are more likely to occur, enormously damaging control system and, consequently, catastrophic accidents may be inevitable.
To sum up, automatic cars are predicted to break into market as a result of technological advancements and social requirement, in which advantages stay parallel with disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | tsln7607 | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | AnnaAlysia | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | thankforyourhelp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | creaam | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows different types of household waste in a city between 1992 and 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table show the average salaries of graduates and non graduates in the UK in 2010 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- In some countries it is illegal to reject people applying for jobs because of their ages Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more people 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...for accelerating their innovations. In my opinion, while driverless vehicles c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83275261324 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37267471673 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665505226481 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1447798578 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0769230769 7.06120827912 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110467869035 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376672626048 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399251166274 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636718011923 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244072126106 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.