Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Increasing number of car accidents nowadays is a serious problem which is addressed in time before this would be the main reason causing people die. Unfortunately, it is reported computer and robot are applied to control vehicle. Even though some people argue that this new innovative car could not response rightly in critical situation. I agree with this notion to what extent as in my opinion, regulating use robotic cars should be clearly stated.
It is an undeniable fact that human decision depends on emotion. For this reason, substituting the traditional way with automatic cars would standardize traffic rules and make a precise determination in addition to reducing risk in transportation. Moreover, navigating system connecting satellite could report traffic real-time and opt appropriate route which makes every people arrive on time. Lastly, in case of protecting car from robbery or illegal usability. As a result, the GPS systems are applied in police detection which reports the location of accused automobiles and then officers could follow.
On the other hand, only human can decide in dangerous situation. For instance, carrying the patient to hospital by personal car might be slow in addition to speed is limited by artificial intelligence. This could be slowed down because computer understands moving fast on the road might contribute to accidents. Furthermore, many drivers would be fired and then government is inevitable to spend money as a compensation to them, costing big budget to other sides would be better.
All things considered, some advocate that computerizing control in our cars could enhance our quality of life, while opponents concern about evaluating and solving significant issues. I firmly believe that using computer controls our cars has more advantages which overshadow its disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | tsln7607 | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | AnnaAlysia | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | thankforyourhelp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | creaam | 78 | view |
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major German airports between 2007 and 2012. 78
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society? 84
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d robot are applied to control vehicle. Even though some people argue that this new innovat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...Even though some people argue that this new innovative car could not response rightly in criti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94744360806 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670175438596 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3466644075 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898449063987 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297926083396 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242713997223 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545271112597 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221805448302 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.