Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Nowadays, the question of whether global language should be applied worldwide or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On one hand, the emergence of global language brings about plenty of advantages. First, since global language facilitates the process of approach knowledge for everyone without language barriers, people would gain a wealth of knowledge much easier. For example, every individual can have a grasp of fields like science, technology while all writing convert thoroughly into a sole language for everyone, which helps them broaden their horizons. Second, by using international language, nations can accelerate the economic growth. This means that in the time of industrialization, there are more and more multinational corporations arisen couple with foreign experts working everywhere, thus a unite language using in working helps people exchange information effortlessly and increase their work productivity.
On the other hand, the adoption of a universal language has some disadvantages. First, language assimilation leads to the extinction of other minority languages. In fact, nations have difficulty in abandoning their own languages due to a great deal of historic and cultural values, entailing the disappearance of cultural identities. Second, in order to create one universal language, it acquires much more effort and time to get it done. This means that this process requires cooperation of a whole host of linguists around the world to invent a language that easy to learn, easy to speak, however the chance of being successful is low because it takes thousands of years to accomplish this process.
In conclusion, though the ideal of a controversial language appears to be attractive, its drawbacks will be far more significant. literally, the same language is not necessary because by creating multicultural events, mutual understandings would be accelerated
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | christine2320 | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | My Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether global language should be applied world...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oreign experts working everywhere, thus a unite language using in working helps p...
^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oreign experts working everywhere, thus a unite language using in working helps people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Literally
...drawbacks will be far more significant. literally, the same language is not necessary bec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tual understandings would be accelerated
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62913907285 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12386991101 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.15033364 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069554283748 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251122568965 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313421214939 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469734644666 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165739836343 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.