Animals experiments have never failed to be a heated debate among society, research institutes, and universities. Some people hold the position that it would be interesting when using living animals for researches. However, some others take a view that animals experiments must be cruel. Personally, I would not be hesitate to side with the former view with several reasons.
The first important reason is that it would be easier to have direct consequences when using animals to do researches. When testing medical effects of a new type of medicine, scientists could vaccinate this kind of medicine to animals. On that case, scientists could observe the symptoms showed by these animals so that they can ensure whether this kind of innovative medicine need to be improved in the future. Hence, using animals could be a ready mean of measuring the experiment results in field of medical researches.
Moreover, some animals can provide human beings with essential organs for transplantation. Genetic technology will change the genes of some animals. In the near future, organs of animals will take the place of artificial organs like heart pumps, prolonging patients life.
Although it is suggested that using animals to do research would be contradicted to humanitarian pricinples, it is true that using animals in moderation would be helpful for progress of medical science researches. We would be thankful to the contributions of these animals' life to research, but we have to do that. This is because not only are their contributions precious for progress of medical research, but it would also helpful for curing some diseases in animals.
In my opinion, I supposed that there is no evidence that showing the links between using animals for researches and cruelty if we can use animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all creatures in our planet.
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Mor 86
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 61
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked 50
- Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... researches. We would be thankful to the contributions of these animals life to r...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...thankful to the contributions of these animals life to research, but we have to do tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rches and cruelty if we can use animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, i suppose, kind of, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1868852459 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86956244142 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52131147541 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.232572076 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204881868426 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828057478355 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592120900957 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127504266847 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382333523667 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.