Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In recent years, some rare linguistic system is becoming increasingly extinctive when few groups use it in their communities. It is argued that spending government budget on preserving these languages should be conducted; however, the others suggest that this trend would be wasted. Personally judging, these opinions possess both advantages and disadvantages to a certain extent, and the latter statement would bring more benefits in the whole of the circumstance.
Firstly, regarding the first statement, preserving languages spoken less widely should be made great emphasis on money investment to preserve local culture and strengthen the rich cultural diversity. In detail, a language is much more than simply a means of communication, which means a vital connection with the cultural identity of people who speak it. By spending money on protecting minority languages, government can preserve local traditions, customs and behaviors. Also, if a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and society will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes the public more interesting.
Secondly, considering the view of saying these languages as a waste of money, there are two reasonable causes related to expenses and the effectiveness of this phenomenon. In detail, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programs will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services such as healthcare system or basic infrastructure. As a result, it would be cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language.
In conclusion, every option always has its pros and cons, so government should choose appropriate policies to get the highest levels of benefits at that time. Additionally, spending a great amount of money on preserving a minority language would be a heavy burden of the state budget, which is less effective than other investment in healthcare system or basic infrastructure.
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both t 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that makes the public more interesting. Secondly, considering the view of saying...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...detail, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programs wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
...s and cons, so government should choose appropriate policies to get the highest levels of b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39329268293 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01542731692 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7524383657 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310144383955 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102531241777 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558435407994 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178130321605 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038542334154 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.