Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
To support the poor person in some extent is a good willing. On that way developed countries should support the undeveloped and developing countries. Some other think that unwealthy nations should responsible for state and people needs. In my point of view wealthy nations can support the poorer nations to offer their daily needs.
To some extent,it can not be denied that, in democratic countries government itself responsible to gives their citizen requirement. Because in those countries, government chosen by the people to improve their quality of life. The government should responsible to plan long-term goal to give good environment high standard of education and improve the welfare of the inhabitants. Lack of planning about distribution of financial budget, it could be reason for lower economy of poorer countries.
In addition to that, more and more product import from other countries rather than make and grown it by their countries. Furthermore, lack of natural resources from the land it also reason to basic need should be import from others. Less knowledge about technologies and latest techniques to make good quality good also affect to the country's economy.
For that reason, wealthy nation should provide some of the support to impoverished economy by invest in unwealthy terrain to provide job, high level of education, basic requirements by given natural resources for transportation and electricity production.
To close our discussion and evolution over that to some point of view developed nation should give basic facilities to improve economy of developing countries. If the poorer nation have good local resources so they can provide good and high quality of life to their dwellers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
- Too much emphasis is being placed on going university for academic education. People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a shortage of qualified tradespeople.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014. 78
- The pie chart shows the main reasons what agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s. 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are importance in achieving happiness? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...fer their daily needs. To some extent,it can not be denied that, in democratic c...
^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...t can not be denied that, in democratic countries government itself responsible to gives ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reasons'?
Suggestion: reasons
...natural resources from the land it also reason to basic need should be import from oth...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imported'?
Suggestion: imported
... it also reason to basic need should be import from others. Less knowledge about techn...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t reason, wealthy nation should provide some of the support to impoverished economy by inve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39259259259 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81530210207 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492592592593 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8837500707 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288810552441 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101389509513 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836582763885 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164891316801 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667702372889 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.