Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are a great number of heated discussions over the issues of smoking prohibition in public areas. Many people strongly believe that its absolutely enormous merits. Because of many harms of smoking, i suppose our government to prevent smokers from smoking in public places.

One of the most significant arguments for ban smoking in public areas is the avoiding of harm from smoking. Truly, smoking is injurious to health. When the smoker smoke cigarettes which release kinds of carbon and nicotine which cause damage to not only smokers but also non-smokers were affected by smoking and get diseases. Cancer is among of the most dangerous diseases. To illustrate that, my father was addicted in smoking. As a result, he got a cancer and passed away 10 years ago. Therefore , it is absolutely rational to ban smoking, namely, in such areas.

Moreover, early of recognizing by government, smoking causes serious damage to community health and has some actions to discourage smoking such as setting up special places for smoking, increasing tax and putting cigarette in luxury goods. In many researches illustrated that these actions really useful to discourage people from smoking and reduce the number of people to smoke.

By contrast, a few addicted smokers is feel disadvantage for moving. when they are working at office, they must move to smoking areas.

In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. Ban smoking in particular places is the most definitely a positive action. In my opinion, leading to safeguard the health and wealth of society.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rits. Because of many harms of smoking, i suppose our government to prevent smoke...
^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and passed away 10 years ago. Therefore , it is absolutely rational to ban smokin...
^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...mokers is feel disadvantage for moving. when they are working at office, they must m...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11832061069 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66338343088 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0235930496 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8823529412 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289931141389 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894466131206 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814303669928 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162109351886 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564019990147 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.