Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
It is true that along with information update, social networking sites have facilitated connection between residents. While this tendency has several benefits, its drawbacks are also discernible.
On the one hand, communication and news publicity through social media are recognized as a favorable trend thanks to a number of reasons. To begin with, sites such as Twitter and Facebook are versatile, and their various features have made it easier than ever to maintain contacts between citizens. Indeed, it is personal posts, text messaging or video call functions that enormously support users to keep abreast of their friends and families despite long distance, which used to be impossible in previous centuries. In addition, no sooner had social networking sites became prevalent than they were leveraged by media outlets to provide up-to-the-minute news. Hence, in comparison to the past, when the major population relied on newspapers and magazines published daily or weekly, information has been unprecedentedly more accessible as a result of this technological breakthrough.
On the other hand, social platform also induces concerns over many aspects. From an information perspective, most internet communities entitle all users to freely publicize news and personal viewpoints, after which they go viral without advance verification. As a consequence, were these contents not authentic or contain offensive details, not only would this distort facts, but it also negatively influences the public’s insights of a certain issue. From a health perspective, it is inevitable that using social media, residents channel more time into using electronic devices rather than joining physical activities. Therefore, a long exposure to blue light from them may lead to a higher incidence of refractive errors, whereas the sedentary lifestyle they accidentally adopted makes them more prone to metabolism disorders.
Briefly, the emergence of online forums as a major tool for socializing and news acquisition has a double-edged impacts on people.
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'impact'?
Suggestion: impact
...and news acquisition has a double-edged impacts on people.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n has a double-edged impacts on people.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7003257329 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0763364202 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684039087948 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9776479646 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.615384615 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130239511227 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044824667567 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389269979069 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751233233841 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200115507358 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.