Some advocates argue that it is good to share as much information as possible, others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
In the contemporary world, human understanding has been promoted more than ever. Each one of us always being encouraged to learn and to share as much as we can. But, in this case, some controversial opinions haven't been reconciled yet. While some advocates argue that it is good to share as much information as possible, others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. In my point of view, each perspective has its strengths and weaknesses, but honestly, I still spend a bias for the later.
On the one hand, sharing knowledge is beneficial. It is a known fact that, the more we know about this world, the more we become better and wiser. Normally, when we give, we lost, even if it much or not. But when it comes to knowledge, giving does not mean losing, it is multiplying the information. Moreover, spreading information not only expands people's minds but also makes many phenomenal changes to the world. For instance, when a cure is shared, millions of lives are saved; when an invention is released, millions of life are more convenient; and when a message is brought out, millions of lives are happier.
On the other hand, there are some aspects make me strongly support that exists many kinds of information should not be leaked. To be more specific, each research has its credit. If a doctrine was not published the person creating, it would be unfair. Additionally, making information equal making money, so losing it also mean losing money. As an example, when a company's fundamental document had been stolen and then being sold for the opponents, it will lead to huge damage.
In conclusion, sharing information including both advantages and disadvantages. So that if people can distinguish which case understanding could be given and which not, it will be extremely profitable and wonderful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | milothemilker | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- What are the main differences between Asian and western weddings? Analyze the causes of that difference 78
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE FIXED PUNISHMENTS FOR EACH TYPE OF CRIME. OTHERS, HOWEVER ARGUE THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF AN INDIVIDUAL CRIME, AND THE MOTIVATION FOR COMMITTING IT, SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DECIDING ON THE PUNISHMENT.DISC 56
- The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'being'.
Suggestion: being always
...promoted more than ever. Each one of us always being encouraged to learn and to share as muc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... this case, some controversial opinions havent been reconciled yet. While some advocat...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t out, millions of lives are happier. On the other hand, there are some aspec...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
...n equal making money, so losing it also mean losing money. As an example, when a com...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98717948718 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85969290729 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3598015387 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4444444444 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367904256739 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105018661351 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.215795333724 0.0667982634062 323% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216948504402 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19712708004 0.056905535591 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.