Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion

There is no denying the fact that charity has impacted needy people lives to a great extent. In a temporary era, few individual believe that donate money to organisations their own country, another side people argue that the aid of any needy people, whereas they live. This essay would shed light on both views standpoints in the upcoming paragraph.

To embark on the first school of thought, the advocates favouring charity organisation should do aid in the living country. To elaborate, in living countries tremendously live poor people. So, our society members should that made of a charity organisation only help of the own country. Charity organisation technique should be all countries. In addition, people should collect money from every home in societies and it is donated to the needy person for livelihood. Thus, therefore its increase of happiness in life and gain of between love.

Furthermore, the masses supporting aid every needy person have viewpoints that, it is a more crucial role in globalisation. However, we can say that enormous living poor people. While help every needy person, and whears they live. For example, charity organisations techniques should share number on social website and television. So, which people are a contact of the organisation.

To conclude, in my view that we are donating money for a needy person because it very difficult conditions. Charity organisations is a significant role in the day to day lives. We can not neglect that the aid of every person .

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...umber on social website and television. So, which people are a contact of the organisatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...not neglect that the aid of every person .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in my view, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15040650407 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87131602859 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8751013482 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5294117647 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269917008692 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890430545985 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065228844551 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163581632359 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783866253074 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.