Nowadays, everyone is overwhelmed with a lot of commitments. Therefore, it is an argued issue whether youngsters ought to allocate their leisure time more with family members rather than involving themselves in recreational activities. I completely agree with this notion since sparing time with family have enormous positive outcomes.
Commencing with the most salient reason why young ones need to be in the company of family members, it aids to strengthen the family bonds. Owing to the generation gap, all members of the family have diverse opinions which, occasionally, becomes the reason for conflict among them; nevertheless, utilization of more spare time with family means more harmony in their relations. Moreover, family members help young individuals in terms of providing, them with guidance. Unlike most television shows which often mislead the juveniles towards the wrong path, family members are experienced and always remain there with youngsters to supporting them not only in decision making but also in financial crises. Ergo, the family is far more imperative for spare time utilization.
Another worth considering season is the holistic growth of youngsters star is attained while being indie company of family. By playing more entertaining electronic games, children neither take care of their health nor concentrate adequately on studies whereas utilization of time with family leads them to live a healthy and meaningful life.
For example, most of the children had become addicted to playing blue whale game worldwide; consequently, it made juveniles behave aggressively and adopt anti-social demeanour. Therefore, more time needs to be spent with family members so that their behaviour patterns can be supervised by elders as well as their overall developed can be ensured.
To conclude, despite the benefits of recreational activities, strong family bonding, guidance and personality development of children cannot be achieved until they spend more time with family.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 85
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to playing blue whale game worldwide; consequently, it made juveniles behave a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61716171617 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87025511593 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5453852167 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197934926352 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776666773541 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435027813024 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115457345193 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280711176135 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.