The line chart depicts the information about the Australian exports in Japan, the US, China and India between 1990 and 2012. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
Looking at overall, it is lucid the highest data onto Chia and in the contrary side in India by far the lowest figure.
Commencing with the ratio of the experts in Japan and the Us was 26% and 11%, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of exports decrease significantly in 1995. Moreover, there had been a dramatic increase shows in the Us country, which is accounted for 5% in 2010. After two years, the observe in minimally increase in the US at 7% in 1995. However, no marked difference noticed in Japan at the end of the period.
Furthermore, the ratio of Australian exports in China and India was similar data who was near about 5%. While, the marginal difference noticed from India till 2000. On another side, Chia was similarly risen, which is reached to until 5%. In addition, at the end of the figure noticed that it is a touch of peak point in 2012 and India had data lowest than another figure.
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 66
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ounted for 5% in 2010. After two years, the observe in minimally increase in the US at 7% i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...was similar data who was near about 5%. While, the marginal difference noticed from I...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69109947644 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56905398467 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7658312447 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6666666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124188362644 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430198284694 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584314670937 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779511720156 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066122311125 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.