Some believe that mass transportation is good, but this transportation has a setback. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Mass transit has some advantages, but it has the drawbacks as well. Although this transportation's facilities are still unreliable, the term of special services will be offered to passengers.
Presumably, the lack of costumers' satisfaction is the main setback of using mass transit. This is because cleanliness rate is out of control by cleaning staff because of over-passenger numbers particularly in rush hours, so the customers will gain the confined space since the public transportation running has over capacity. Hence, passengers are not feeling satisfied when travelling by this transportation. For example, 800 of 1000 all-age passengers interviewed in Jakarta proclaimed that they did not feel pleased while using MRT (Mass Rapid Transit) Jakarta because of high-level crowded and bad quality cleanliness. However, I believe that several people do not think these demerits a lot while using mass transit because of the positive impacts given.
What is the significant benefit of passengers using public transit as day-to-day transportation? The more efficient time consumed will be gained because the transportations have special paths to operate. Hence, the passengers will not spend much time in the road due to being trapped in traffic jam for long time compared to using car ownership. For instance, workers living in Cikarang just spend an hour by train to reach their offices in Jakarta, and this contrasted to those driving by private cars commonly spending 90 minutes to arrive in their workplaces in Jakarta. On the whole, the existence of mass transit will solve the problem related to time consuming in the road.
In conclusion, the adverse effect of using mass transit is the shortage of service for customers' comfort, but time efficiency is a beneficial impact from this transportation. It is advocated that th stakeholders of mass transits should boost their services to attract more the civil to switch from using private vehicles to mass transits on their daily lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | Fachri040495 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1990 and 2008 11
- Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses. Nevertheless, they are just as disabling in their own way. However, society is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities, the lat 84
- The graph and table below give information about four new painkilling drugs which have recently been tested on patients.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The three diagram below show the development of, and plans for, the coastal zone of Brightsea.Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features, and make any relevant comparisonsThe growth and forecast at the coastal area of Brightsea c 11
- Some believe that mass transportation is good, but this transportation has a setback. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... it has the drawbacks as well. Although this transportations facilities are still un...
^^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'impacts'' or 'impact's'?
Suggestion: impacts'; impact's
...ng mass transit because of the positive impacts given. What is the significant ben...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0004685953 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584126984127 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7234509658 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152722301534 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622283080701 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334305025046 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108748922874 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413098176576 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.