Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together, while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is believed that the Olympic games help bring people from different parts of the world together, while others contend that the money spent for the Olympic games could be used for other issues. Both of the views will be discussed in this essay before a conclusion is reached.
Beginning with the view that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together, it is considered one of the main values beyond the impacts on societies or economies. To be specific, each four years, athletes from all over the world will gather in the host country for the Olympic games. This is not only a simple competition but also a great chance for international people to learn and exchange cultures, which strengthens bonds among different nations globally or even enhance a vulnerable relationship between two countries. For example, in the Olympic games 2018, there was a picture of South Korean and North Korean athletes, which is forbidden for each citizens in both nations. The picture later became an iconic symbol during 2018 and showed the spirit that the competition wants to spread.
Turning to an alternative viewpoint that the Olympics wastes money which could be used for more significant issues. To hold the Olympics, the host country has to spend millions of dollars for stadiums, facilities and amenities. For instance, it is estimated that Brazil spent over hundred million dollars to prepare for the Olympics in 2018. The glamorous of these games has foreshadowed many problems that Brazil was confronting at that time. Other issues such as medical care, infrastructure and people’s lives was ignored. This will lead to a myriad of social issues such as crimes, slumps which has not been tackled by the government for years.
In conclusion, I believe there are some negative consequences of holding the Olympic games, but host countries will unequivocally consider the significant merits, which is not only improving the economies but also strengthening relationships between nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essay before a conclusion is reached. Beginning with the view that the Olympic...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the competition wants to spread. Turning to an alternative viewpoint that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20615384615 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72859068029 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550769230769 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0399040015 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417297427279 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13312387059 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115354735079 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263186408197 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122363444803 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.