Some believe that younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting older family members when they become physically, mentally and financially unable to look after themselves. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether young members of families should take care of other members, who are either sick or poor, is a controversial issue. I somewhat agree with the view even though young people should not be held responsible for their relatives under some special circumstances.
The main reason I support of this viewpoint is that without the needed assistance from other younger household members, those people who are disable or broke would feel desperate, which leads to their antisocial behaviors. This in turn can have detrimental impacts on their loved ones and society as a whole. Thus, supporting of other members in families would safeguard young people from unwanted events and contribute to the safety of their immediate vicinity.
Another justification for helping less advantaged relatives is that it would relieves the family members of temporary hardships in life, which encourages them to overcome these challenges and live better off. If these people receive the necessary aid in forms of money, motivation and so forth, they can get recover sooner and start over their career and life.
However, there are still occasions when young individuals can shirk their responsibility for people having close relationship with them. This is especially the case for criminals, who have tendency to repeat their law-offending behaviors. Given their recidivism inclination, these people would make the same mistakes whether they are assisted by other people or not.
In sum, by helping other family members, young persons could avoid negative impacts from them while these people become ill and bankruptcy. However, it is uneccessry to aid other memebers if they are repeatitive law-breakers. Therefore, I mostly side with the perspective that young people should be made legally accountable for other unprivileged people in the same family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is important for parents to read stories to children Others think it is unnecessary because children can find them in other sources e g books and TV Discuss both views and give opinions 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...younger household members, those people who are disable or broke would feel desperate, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disabled'.
Suggestion: disabled
...household members, those people who are disable or broke would feel desperate, which le...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther members in families would safeguard young people from unwanted events and co...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'relieve'
Suggestion: relieve
...s advantaged relatives is that it would relieves the family members of temporary hardshi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44947735192 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78097242378 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0018964795 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169717991162 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658221323288 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456308605571 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105603460589 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466869943837 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.