Some business find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill. What are the causes and suggest possible solutions.
To begin with, we now live in an age when many of us are taking the soft skill into consideration as one of the most prominent issues that virtually new staff should have. However, it goes without saying that lacking rudimentary interpersonal skills among new employees is a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinion. There are some causes as well as specific measurements associated with this issue.
It is universally accepted that the root cause triggering this matter is many new staff just focus too much on the theory instead of noticing practical trials. When it comes to the example of this trend, a number of Vietnamese people just study on the book and they do not purely participate in group activities like presentation or teamwork. Therefore, teachers should organize as many activities as possible for students who are still attending school to address it.
Depending too much on technologies is also another striking reason needed to mention. This means that these people may surf on the Internet to find solutions when facing with arduous circumstances. There is no denying that the important role of social networking site especially the Internet assists people a lot in looking up information with ease. Nevertheless, because of relying on a variety of electric tablets such as smartphone, laptops, they gradually diminish and have no autonomy. Consequently, they necessitate to frequently not only interact but also communicate with people surrounding them in order to improve cooperative skill.
In conclusion, one could deduce that we have lots of causes in some aspects as well as solutions to approach the issue of lacking fundamental interpersonal skills among new employees.
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 78
- Some business find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill What are the causes and suggest possible solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.985309782 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5623333862 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229699617264 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732139700151 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749804529774 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144601578409 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084311582091 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.