Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skill. What are the causes and suggest possible solutions.
In today’s world, the boom of labor market plays a vital role which make an outstanding contribution to many companies as marked milestone. However, new workers sometimes lack of experiences communicating with their partners such as team building, I strongly believe that the only way to handle with this circumstance is by themselves.
Turning to the main issues which have an impact on the interactive skills of people. First of all, when new staffs begin their works, there is no doubt that they may attempt to get familiar with many strange things in the businesses. As a result, they will be at risk if they do not ask their coworkers to support them. For instance, a new banker cannot avoid lots of harmful effects due to the different between theories and read situations, old employees can help them to enhance their understanding. Secondly, based on the lack of their connectivity with others, people can struggle with some problems in their work offices. For example, if young people have to expose to team works, they will be confused because it is extremely hard to find harmony between everyone.
To deal with this issue, the youth should strengthen the relationship between them and others because it pave the way for the sake of the sustainable development of companies. According to the analysis of many scientists, they concretely prove that both young and old employees have their own potential abilities and they will be triumphant due to their interactive abilities. Last but not least, maintaining the connection with old staffs can bring a lot of benefits to young people which plays a vital role in their corporates.
In conclusion, young employees are still interrupt by cooperative skills because of their weak experiences, I completely believe that if they comprehend how to make use of opportunities to make friends with colleagues, they will not only successful but they may also come highly recommended.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | phanduydat | 84 | view |
- Task 2: The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
- the line graph shows thefts per thounsand vehicles in 4 european countries between 1990 and 1999 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- the process of making chocolate 78
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paves'?
Suggestion: paves
...ship between them and others because it pave the way for the sake of the sustainable...
^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'interrupted'.
Suggestion: interrupted
...n conclusion, young employees are still interrupt by cooperative skills because of their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10971786834 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9026080343 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3418612974 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0833333333 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151850447164 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561875152363 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376925974279 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930740936145 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032446920161 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.