In some cities, people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, whiles in other cities. Riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better?
In this contemporary setting, transportation tools are given paramount importance. Some are of the opinions that people should use cars as opposed to ride bikes, while others differ in this view. Considering this situation, it is crucial to explore the reasons, and I believe that riding bikes is a better development.
There are several reasons for this situation. To begin with, in some developing countries, there are no bike lanes and bikes are not allowed to carry on subway and buses, so many people tend to drive instead of cycling. To be specific, riding bikes to work or to shopping can cause inconvenience to their life and lead to low efficiency. Consequently, it can undermine the quality of life, so people prefer to drive rather than ride bikes. On the other hand, in some developed countries, people can use the fully functional infrastructures, such as bike lanes, bus, or train. For example, in many wealthy countries, it is more often for people to ride a bike because they have bicycle lanes and they can carry their bike on the bus or trains in case they tired. As a result, people’s lives will not be interrupted by any inconvenience which people cannot drive.
Riding bikes tends to bring more benefit than driving cars, as cycling plays a pivotal role in uplifting people’s quality of life. To be precise, cycling is one of the healthiest exercising methods, which provides people to stay fit during their commuting. Therefore, riding bikes can reduce the chance of catching the illness and improve people’s physical health. Besides, cycling to commute or travel can limit the usage of cars, which tends to restrict the green gas emission, thereby preventing people who are vulnerable to chronic diseases, such as lung ailments or a sore throat, from getting the sickness. Hence, improving public health in the long run.
To sum up, in some poor countries, people riding bikes can result in many inconveniences so that driving can bring more advantages. In many wealthy countries, with the development of good infrastructures, people have no inconvenience of riding bikes. From my point of view, riding bikes will deliver a long-term benefit in improving public health.
- In some cities, people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, whiles in other cities. Riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better? 73
- The graph describes the changes in water supply and sanitation in urban and rural areas between 1980 and 1990. 73
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles whiles in other cities Riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 88
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88125261867 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524725274725 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6158476361 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.055555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260128012192 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897299027588 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518923334168 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174263903906 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474663530561 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.