Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sports in various countries are habored to the international levels via the construction of training facilities exclusive to top atheletes, which conclusively raised many questions about whether other individuals would be allowed to posess the same access rights. Personally, as much as I am sympathetic of the former reality, I do believe that the development itself is negative.
At first, it might seems that the establishment of top-athelete-only training facilities is the only way to push national sports to the international realm. One justification for such view would be the driving cost of providing adequate necessities for recreational atheletes. However, as much as the financial perspective of which was inherently accepted by experts for a long time, the same can no longer be said with the creations of various international sport federations with funding policies. Taking a step back from the dicussions about finance, experts also argue that facilities for recreational atheletes is rather a worthless idea as there is no need for professional equipments. For example, Bowling is a well-funded sport in the US where it has received a great amount of maintainance especially in areas such as professional bowling stadiums, yet recreational players did not need professional-grade bowling equipments, and bowling alleys used to be ill-maintained for the public. However, since the advent of well-established bowling alleys in many parts of the US since the 1990s, the sport became a national staple due to the rise in professional players competing on the international stage. Because of this, it is purely logical to conclude that restricting public access to professional-grade sport facilities for the sake of international uprising becomes rather an alienated view than a good one.
In conclusion, based on the the evidents explained above, from the establishment of funding programs by sport federations to the uprise in ambitious athletes with the enabling of public access to professional-grade facilities, I would like to end this essay by expressing further supports to the idea of liberty in sport management.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- People are living in a throwaway society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are its causes and what impacts can it have 80
- We were given two diagrams showing Darwin city waterfront in 2009 and after the 2014 reconstruction We had to compare and describe both of them 78
- The Internet means people do not have to travel to foreign countries to learn about their lives and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words 52
- Some people think that Art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... a good one. In conclusion, based on the the evidents explained above, from the esta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... a good one. In conclusion, based on the the evidents explained above, from the esta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...unding programs by sport federations to the uprise in ambitious athletes with the enabling...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49090909091 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51021597079 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548484848485 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4415078735 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.2 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200589691919 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836782491135 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460764680856 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134952032804 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285787508338 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.