In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent decades, there have been a vigorous debate whether governments need to levy more heavily on fast food due to the substantial growth of diet-related diseases such as obesity, heart attack, etc. Although imposing higher tax constitutes a decent remedy to discourage people from eating such foods, there are a rich variety of different methods in order to handle this problems.
To begin with, if the governments push taxes on junk food, companies manufacturing these will have to rise the costs of products, which gradually make it unaffordable to some social classes, especially the unfortunate one. In fact, Mexico government has just imposed a significant new tax on fast food and sugery drink that is considered as a triumph for the anti-obesity crusade as it rapidly minimizes the related illnesses. Besides, the budget brought back is not only used in addressing the deceases that fast food holds accountable for but also led to subsidies on nutritious vegetables and fruits. Overall, it can be observed that pushing tax can positively get exposed to the social in fighting against fast food and involving repercussions, yet just to a minor social component.
In order to completely slash junk food consumption, It is obviously essential to directly influence citizens’ awareness. For instance, since Japan government has applied “Health” into the curriculum, Japanese people, even young-aged children consciously adopt healthy victuals. Hence, education is inclined to take priority so that people can immune to a multitude of fascinating fast food advertisements. It’s apparent that advertisements show out images of desirable food that somewhat stimulate people’s appetite. Thus, to strictly ensure, governments should ban fast food advertisements in schools or educational complex.
In conclusion, junk food constitutes the driving force of high incidence of diet-related diseases; hence, governments extremely attempt to cut consumption on fast food by pushing taxes. However, I reckon education and forbidden fast food advertisements should be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of different methods in order to handle this problems. To begin with, if the govern...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61949685535 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18835825112 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647798742138 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2024030178 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.461538462 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280308399274 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964779728839 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295375772133 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163920608903 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018814749015 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.