In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the government should impose a higher tax on unhealthy food in order to reduce the health problems suffered by a large number of people. This essay disagrees completely with this statement as imposing tax would not change people’s unconsciousness if healthy eating, thus would fail to identify the real problems to the issue and this action would affect people with low incomes.
It has been identified that the habit of eating unhealthy food based on many factors: the affordable prices of food; the accessibility of stores, the regulatory of exercise and the awareness of healthy eating. Accordingly, it is the unconsciousness of having healthy diet and keeping fit that leads to the increase in health problems such as obesity or dyslipidemia.
Therefore, it is argued that levying tariffs on junk food would fail to tackle health problems that are not directly related to tax policy on food such as: raising people’s awareness of having healthy intakes or adequate sleep and frequent exercise. In this regard, Canada is a prime example. Three years after tax was imposed on unhealthy food options, the consumption on these food was lowered, yet the number of people suffering from obesity raised significantly higher.
In addition to this, imposing tax on a variety of food options may affect people with lower incomes. The absence of healthy food options in so-called urban food deserts means that taxing junk food would disproportionally affect people living there. Accordingly, a survey conducted by the WHO had shown that the combination of inaccessibility in poor countries and hunger leads to the purchase of unhealthy food from people with lower average incomes.
In conclusion, junk food should not be taxed as this action of levying tax of fast food would not be able to tackle other problems related to the increase in health problems and the fact that this action might affect the poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for the government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for year between finishing high school and starting university studies What are the advantages and disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... reduce the health problems suffered by a large number of people. This essay disagrees completely...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ealthy food options, the consumption on these food was lowered, yet the number of people s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10759493671 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79249514986 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481012658228 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1019794506 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370967763361 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156747672445 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701115426865 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222241769474 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481804629758 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.