Nowadays, an increasing number of people are getting enthusiastic about searching out their living places and histories in some countries. I think the reason behind this excavation is related to the nature of people's knowing the unknown and also to their personal security. My suggestion for conducting every scrutiny of research would be to collect information from the neighbourhood.
To commence with, Since the beginning of civilization, people have always been interested in finding out the unknown, like stories about their ancestors. The curious minds of the crowd make them find out the lineage of the owners of their homes. In some countries, it has become a tradition. By way of illustration, in developed countries, the public always wants to know about the history of the land or building they want to buy. If someone cannot find or be convinced by the instruction about the house, they might not be interested in buying the building. Moreover, the reason why the history of the shack is crucial is to repair or replace necessary things. If the accommodation was built a long time ago with poor materials, replacement and maintenance would be important. For example, many authorities have enacted a restricted law limiting the usable life of a building to about 50 years. After that, the historical building has to be repaired or destroyed.
On the other hand, To conduct the research, one should first go to the neighbourhood due to the possibility of knowing the former owner is high. They can provide accurate clues about the previous owner or the history of the homestead. Second, local communities or local gathering individuals could be potential neighbourhoods to look at because local societies often gather in these types of communities. For instance, a café is the best place to collect data. In addition, senior citizens of that particular area could be considered a valuable resource of instruction because they have been living there for a very long time.
In conclusion, the community become more interested in finding out about their livelihood out of curiosity as well as it is very necessary to relax their minds. Indeed, even though there are some old amenities or furniture, many individuals stay happy to lead a life in a favourable place.
- Some people think it is better for children to grown up in the city while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable for them What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think it is better for children to grown up in the city while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable for them What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erested in finding out the unknown, like stories about their ancestors. The curio...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or local gathering individuals could be potential neighbourhoods to look at beca...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best place to collect data. In addition, senior citizens of that particular area ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08556149733 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93248106949 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2229149789 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318132077906 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823009800192 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576392365171 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176439222217 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547478650678 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erested in finding out the unknown, like stories about their ancestors. The curio...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or local gathering individuals could be potential neighbourhoods to look at beca...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best place to collect data. In addition, senior citizens of that particular area ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08556149733 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93248106949 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2229149789 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318132077906 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823009800192 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576392365171 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176439222217 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547478650678 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.