In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this?
In this day and age, a growing number of people in certain societies are more likely to discover the origin of their dwelling places. There will be several explanations for this tendency and some possible ways are proposed to accomplish this finding.
To begin with, there are two primary reasons why individuals are becoming more eager to recognize the history of the home they reside in. First of all, they want to make sure their house is a safe and comfortable environment to live in. They will find out the process of building a house. Whether it has been built solidly or not, is there any problem during implementation because that greatly affects later life. For instance, if a storm comes over, they will be reassured because their house is solidly built. Secondly, nany people believe in building's spirituality. The architecture and structure of residences, as well as the house's history, may all have an influence on the life of the owner. For example, in several houses which have experienced a string of bad luck and difficulties in the past, such as accidents, sickness and so on, the new owners will face a slew of misfortunes and troubles.
In some of these situations, ascertaining the history of a home or structure is problematic; however; there are some viable solutions for people to explore. Firstly, the new owner can contact the former possessor of the building to clarify queries or ask their neighbors. Second, you may utilize social media to obtain helpful information about your home, such as online groups on Facebook about travel, places, and other topics, where you can pose your questions and receive responses from other members. Last but not least, you can look for some information in newspapers. If you live in an ancient building or luxury one, there's a good possibility that information about it may appear in some publications.
To sum up, finding out the history of a dwelling is more interesting nowadays but from my point of view, the owner needs to make cautious research before purchasing or constructing it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life 89
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 78
- The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'houses'' or 'house's'?
Suggestion: houses'; house's
...structure of residences, as well as the houses history, may all have an influence on t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...e in an ancient building or luxury one, theres a good possibility that information abo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96531791908 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76646215235 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5886753781 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37330960782 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103033969061 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559623524833 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193913479604 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303899078023 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.