The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households.
Given is the bar chart depicting the percentages of seven age groups living on their own of both genders, meanwhile, the pie chart delineates the total bedrooms in their houses in England in 2011.
It is conspicuous that English females accounted for a slightly higher proportion of people who are living solitary than males. Besides, companionless households with two bedrooms made up the most dominant percentage, while the reverse was true for families with more than five bedrooms.
When it comes to the first chart, the percentages of men from 14 to 49 years old living alone were higher than that of women in which the most significant percentage belonged to the 35-49 aged group with 65% of male. By contrast, a great majority of the people aged 65 or over who were living alone were female. Women more than 85 years old took up around 76% of single occupants. Additionally, people aged 50 to 64 experienced no differences between both genders with 50% of each unaccompanied residing.
Regarding the pie chart, one-person houses with 2 bedrooms lead the chart with 35.4%. One-bedroom and three-bedroom solitary households belonged to second and third positions with 28% and 29.8% respectively. In the meantime, under 7% of single-occupant homes had four or more bedrooms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | lalo | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | Vũ Ngọc Lam | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | nhinhi999 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-02 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between the years 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 67
- The maps give information about aa undetermined area 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09478672986 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91224418469 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5293593477 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336186018441 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118725593235 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835772450146 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185881590385 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504693597007 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.