In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent decades, many statistics have revealed the increased number of fatal gun shootings. Indeed, to my mind, this is now convincing evidence that these incidents occur because of guns possession at home by individuals. In this essay, I shall examine how government laws and people’s violent mind set encourages this action.
To begin with, laws allow easier possession of guns enforced by the governments pave the way for the burgeoning number of murders happen due to shootings. This is because, in a developed society, it is not uncommon to hold guns to ensure the security by the individuals. For example, in the US, Federal government’s laws allow individuals to possess firearms and this widely stimulates anti-social elements to involve in anti-social activities. Such laws clearly encourage people to kill others with the help of guns and result in soaring gun shootings.
Secondly, increased violent mind sets of individuals enable them to react harmfully in the society that causes detrimental effects. This is because violent related video games nowadays enable teenagers as well as adults to react dangerously and commit crimes mainly with weapons such as guns that cause mass destruction to humankind. For example, in Grand Theft Auto, a popular video game in the US, have destroyed the mind set of people who addicted to it to commit serious murders blindly with the absence of moral thinking ability. Therefore, it is certainly the case that negative mind sets improve the number of shootings.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the notion that holding guns at home increase fatal gun shootings. In the future, we will certainly see the society with large number of shooting incidents if laws and people mind sets are not modified for the welfare of the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19931271478 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8373603012 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539518900344 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4183133975 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162712199179 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694919042239 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057436347901 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118943420545 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533797204917 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.