In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people.
Why might this be the case?
Do you think this is positive or negative situations?
In many countries, the majority of population prefers buying homes instead of paying for rent. The former has a plethora of advantages as prestige, conveniences and personal security, but at the same time it could become a challenge for those who does not earn a living enough. Both advantages and drawbacks will be considered in this essay.
People owning houses have not to worry about the landlords and constant payments to them. They could not be afraid of losing their jobs and becoming homeless: in opposite they might freely spend their money and change workplaces whenever they want. However, owning a home means the addition of electricity, central heating and water payments to every-month expenses. And besides, in comparison between bills per apartments and house expenses, the last ones are rather high.
Further, living in your own house opens many precious opportunities and generate motivation to achieve other goals in life. For example, couples living together could think about creation a full-fledged family or somebody could start save up money to become entrepreneur. Nevertheless, it is quite significant fact, that having a house in asset have a positive impact only for those, whose budget allows to buy a home. Other part of population will be much more under pressure of having huge loans and struggling to maintain the house costs. And in addition, owning houses strengthens the distribution of population by income, so middle class families might have a feeling of inadequacy that they could not afford to buy their own home.
In this matter, demerits are overshadowed by merits. Having a dwelling for your own is considered a positive approach to tackle the disastrous inflation that many countries are struggling with. To put it simply, due to this economic crisis, many people have to increase the amount of rent or deposit to rent a place that they are living in at the moment. Thus, possessing a home may be costly in the
First stage, but people can benefit from it in a long-term period.
In conclusion, I suppose that having house in asset may influence positively on those families who are able to maintain all expenses on it, and for others in could be unreasonable investment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-15 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers They are used in businesses hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used for in future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of th 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently when others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and giv
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., possessing a home may be costly in the First stage, but people can benefit from...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05449591281 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75707043533 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564032697548 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2470742989 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.117647059 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218567430799 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711114707475 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032001479002 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107858898719 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566402104713 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.