In this day and age, the working class population has gravitated towards doing overtime at work with a view to added payment and promotion. Form my perspective, this trend is likely to bring about more adverse impacts on employees than some of its benefits. The above essay will illustrate several reasons behind the issue and account for why its drawbacks outweigh.
To begin with, there are two main justifications for the extension of working hours. Initially, the first one is obviously the desire of higher income. In fact, in recent years the escalating cost of living has made life increasingly difficult for people from lower classes, the salary of whom barely suffices to afford basic necessities. For instance, the living expense monthly of a nuclear family in Hanoi is approximately 35.58 million VND, apart from the rental cost. Therefore, workers have to do everything in their powers to maintain a decent standard of living for whole family. Besides, another factor is to climb a career ladder in offices. Generally, regular work hours is not enough for employees to finish their tasks and achieve the best efficiency that is extremely essential to get the job advancement. If people do not have a tendency to spend extra hours at work, they can not satisfy the demands for working performance in such a competitive labour market. From that, overtime seems inevitable for workers who is ambitious and competent.
However, to some extents, working too much is able to disadvantageous. The most significant is the damage to workers’ health. In case they often undergo an overdose of work, they will have lack of time to rest and take proper care of themselves. As a result, they can suffer from both physical and mental diseases such as tiredness, sleeplessness or stress and even depression. According to a survey, each year, in Japan, there are about 20000 work- realted moralities including stroke and suicide, which is really alarming about the overtime situation. Furthermore, extra hours at work may lead to the work-life imbalance. It is a fact that working parents usually have too little time for famliy, especially for their children. This can affect the youth development negatively because children are not looked after and educated properly. Importantly, the lack of family quality time is capable of worsening the family relationship and lessening the communication and trust among family members.
In conclusion, two of fundamental reasons for staying longer at work are remuneration and burden of working improvemnet. If the problems keeps increasing, employees will face with some troubles in blending well with their job and daily life.
- Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school Which of these two school policies do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 89
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 75
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that studying online is more effective than studying on campus while others disagree Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...alary of whom barely suffices to afford basic necessities. For instance, the living expense month...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83142258859 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7315917143 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3913043478 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203002314955 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538418082351 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060333783071 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123025578937 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211029286303 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...alary of whom barely suffices to afford basic necessities. For instance, the living expense month...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83142258859 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7315917143 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3913043478 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26086956522 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203002314955 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538418082351 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060333783071 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123025578937 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211029286303 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.