The metropolitan cities are said to have an immense significance for the mankind in this competitive world, and thus, during the last one decade, the migration in the big cities has risen briskly almost throughout the world, due to this there is a swift decrease in the quality of life. Further, the interpretation of causes and solutions is yet to be commenced in the subsequent paragraphs.
Myriad of reasons that need to be considered behind the declination of quality of life in the cities, the first and foremost is overpopulation because it creates congestion and other social issues; thereby, living the number of people in the cities. Besides this, a large number of people tend to use more private vehicles for commuting the destinations in this fast-moving world; hence, this usage of vehicles leads to air pollution, and meanwhile, people have to face dire consequences on their physical health. The overload in public places, schools, and hospitals is also associated with the major cause of stress on the people’s mind in the urban areas as they do not get relaxation for the stability of mind.
There are certain solutions that may have a fruitful outcome in order to enhance the quality of life in the cities. Firstly, government have to live up to their responsibilities in terms of improving the condition of transportation , it is evident that the less dependency on private vehicles and more on public vehicles such as trains and buses may lead to solving the problem of traffic congestion and pollution, and thereafter, people can enjoy the good environment free from noise and harmful gases. Finally, commencing campaigns to aware the people about nuclear families is likely to be a prominent way to control the population; subsequently, people will be careful about this fact for getting better comforts as well as facilities.
In conclusion, though solving problems is an arduous task, yet the amalgamation of both the government and the individual plays an instrumental role to solve any kind of problem. Hence, it is also a must for both of them to get together for solving the problem of the low quality of living in the cities.
- Nowadays, people waste a lot of food that is bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 56
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words. 78
- Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are destroying social interactions To want extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Process: How to get a driving licenceDescribe the flowchart below by posting a comment 73
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...commenced in the subsequent paragraphs. Myriad of reasons that need to be consid...
^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... of people in the cities. Besides this, a large number of people tend to use more private vehicle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mproving the condition of transportation , it is evident that the less dependency ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01111111111 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94303046524 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.8892722581 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.4 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12334760931 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496874871356 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344216887801 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771745494719 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415785187109 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.