In some countries, the quality of life in larger cities is declining.
Why do you think this is happening? What measures can be taken to stop it.
Although bitter, but it must be admitted that the standard of living in big cities is deteriorating. This is mainly because of the lack of socializing among urban people and issues caused due to over-population. There are a number of solutions which should be implemented to deal with the problem of degrading life in big urban cities.
Focusing on the reasons, the foremost argument for degrading life in urban areas is that interaction among young people is on fall. Urban dwellers fail to communicate efficiently with their neighbours and friends, which in turn create a sense of insecurity among individuals. Since each and every individual is staying in their own isolated virtual world, they are unable to share feelings and emotions towards each other; thereby, creating far-reaching repercussions. For instance, according to a recent survey by a known magazine of northern India, children dwelling in cities are prone to depression when compared to village children. The other reason is people residing in big cities also have to cope with several issues due to increasing population like traffic congestion, pollution and higher cost of living. These issues not only increase the risk of developing illness among urban people but also reduce their longevity.
There are two effective solutions to the problem of the declining standard of living in big cities. One way to tackle this is to improve employment opportunities in rural areas. By doing this, it will ensure that urban areas are less congested and less populated which will help to control various issues like pollution and increased the cost of living. For instance, a recent initiative taken by Gujarat government in Western India to develop small villages by providing vivid subsidies to people residing there has encouraged many youths to stay at their village rather than migrating to urban areas in search of a decent job. Another method of dealing with the declining quality of life in larger urban areas is to improve the interaction between people. Regular social occasions, events and games can be arranged by like-minded people to encourage people to socialize. This solution will hopefully prevent them from isolation and help them to share their feelings and engage in teamwork.
In conclusion, creating job opportunities in rural areas and motivating people to socialize are effective in dealing with the issue. If the government and residents take concerted action, these problems can be solved to a greater extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
- Shopping has become a new favorite pastime for younger generations. Why is this the case? Should we encourage them to develop other hobbies too? 73
- Write a letter to your friend who is visiting a city that you are familiar with 1 Describe to him the place orth visiting 2 Eating Options 3 Transport Options 82
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 73
- Some educationalists think that international exchange visit would benefit teenagers in the school Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 83
- Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 993, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their feelings and engage in teamwork. In conclusion, creating job opportunitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27182044888 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80200726376 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533665835411 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6850777423 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101443758718 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344633760347 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293164745843 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679788009519 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308055398789 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.