In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, which may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
It is widely recognized that shops in city centers are losing out to large shops in suburban areas. This is because the latter have lower rent and pay lower wages for workers due to their location, and so they can offer the same items at lower prices, giving them a definitive competitive edge. As a result, more people are buying cars to benefit from such differences in prices. I strongly believe that this development is a welcome one overall.
It is certainly true that the success of large out-of-town shops means small retailers are going out of business, leading their workers to lose their jobs. However, this shift in customers’ buying behavior also creates more jobs for people living near these large stores and higher demand for cars, thus canceling out the problem of job losses in city centers.
It is also important to note that customers of shops located in outlying areas can save money since these shops have more competitive prices, as seen above. For example, they can plan ahead what they want to buy and make a weekly trip to suburban shops where they can buy in large quantities at lower prices.
Although there are concerns about environmental and traffic problems caused by the increase in the use of cars, I believe that these concerns are misplaced. In fact, instead of making regular trips to shops in town centers, people often wait until weekends to buy everything they need for a week in out-of-town shops. This might actually reduce the amount of CO2 released from cars in cities, alleviating the problem of air pollution. Given this change in movement, congestion in cities is also likely to be curbed because fewer and less frequent trips are made for shopping purposes on the city’s roads.
In summary, it is my conviction that the shift towards shopping in large out-of-town stores not only helps reduce traffic in cities but also benefits shoppers, and the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in fact, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91692307692 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4839861075 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7041570649 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.923076923 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264231696789 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961866516817 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744320948406 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156772303672 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517530964832 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.