In some countries, university students live at home, while in other countries, university students go to other cities rather than live with their family. Do you think the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages.
In some nations, university pupils choose to stay at home, meanwhile, in other countries, they decide to live in other cities instead. Personally, I endorse the statement that this phenomenon’s advantage outweigh the drawback as students become more independent.
Regarding the benefit of students’ decision to move out of their family, there are one primary effect that can be identified. Specifically, they can nurture a sense of independence for themselves because they have to deal with different problems in life without the support from their parents. In this way, they can learn many important and useful skills. For instance, they must know how to manage their financial budget since many students are still financially dependent on their family and they only receive a small monthly allowance. Therefore, living far away from family can have a positive impact on university pupils.
However, the phenomenon of students living away from home can also have disadvantage. In detail, since they are out of their parents’ supervision, students can indulge themselves in mentally and physically harmful activities. If they cannot realize the detrimental effects of those activities, they may continue their indulgence, which can lead to damaging consequences. For example, university may play truants and miss class, the result of which is poor performance in tests. The given explanation can justify the insidious aspect of university students’ moving out.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on the ultimate effects of the trend of moving out for college, I strongly agree with the notion that the beneficial impact can exceed the deleterious one. By moving out of their home, they can gain more experience and skills that are crucial to be successful and independent in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-29 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | anothernotice | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Minty@1411 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43109540636 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93876115008 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593639575972 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9994767103 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246138734737 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971388152817 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919738229959 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167800536084 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899343846555 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.