in some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

Work and travel benefit the students in many aspects. Students taking a year gap between school and university studies become very common in many countries. From my perspective there are more advantages than disadvantages by taking a year gap before starting university studies. Students gains knowledge by having year gap before beginning university studies and also there is a chance of deviating student’s interest from studies.
Traveling and working before university studies brings plethora advantages to students. Lads by working as an apprentice in their future study field helps them to gain knowledge as well as a small amount of money and that helps him to study with ease. Students can also pay their fee in the university himself by earning in this year gap. Young people while traveling encounters many people with different skills and various cultures. Which makes him very intelligent in social skills. This benefits students to cope with university people like mentors, class mates, management and workers easily. There are few disadvantages also for students by taking the year gap. Students by working and traveling before university studies leads to a wrong direction in few cases
There is a chance of mind diversion from studies to other activities. Young people by focusing on travelling or work may lead them to change their goals and aims. Because they habituated to work and enjoy. There is also chance of losing interest on a study that may spoil the student's career.
In conclusion, there is more chance of advantages than disadvantages for students taking a year gap between school and university education. students get benefited by taking a year gap but they can also lose interest on education

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... different skills and various cultures. Which makes him very intelligent in social sk...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 768, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... leads to a wrong direction in few cases There is a chance of mind diversion from...
^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udy that may spoil the students career. In conclusion, there is more chance of a...
^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...etween school and university education. students get benefited by taking a year gap but ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they can also lose interest on education
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.229390681 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73798999287 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7632398469 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8235294118 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264959136379 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100223418004 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070124668172 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169646826456 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424849181343 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.