In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
These days, young students are encouraged to take a gap year before entering university. It has several clear benefits, but it also has some disadvantages. In this essay, I will point out the pros and cons of this predisposition.
A primary advantage of taking a year off is that students are allowed to explore the outside world to get practical experience. When studying at high school, people are acquired to learn academic knowledge which does not help them much in their future jobs. It is necessary for learners to apply their basic knowledge in real life to learn skills from trials and errors. For example, students could hone their communication skills and leadership skills through internships and service projects, which do them a favor in applying for jobs in the future. Moreover, taking a year break from academics also releases the stress of academic burnout of learning at high school. Take it as an example. In Vietnam, it is visible that students spend about 12 years finishing their high school program; in addition, to accomplish their GCSE, students have to exert themselves for the final exam, so it takes a lot of efforts and time to obtain this certification. As a result, after losing too much energy, they feel exhausted and need a year to relax.
Although the tendency has potential merits, it also brings some drawbacks. One negative side is that many students will waste a huge amount of time; therefore, they stall the academic momentum. For instance, many students battle to figure out the purpose of their gap year, but not having clear goals then spending time doing unnecessary things such as computer games, watching TV, and hanging out with friends. Moreover, having an extra year could make a massive transformation in job applyings, and students who do not know how to utilize this time will be left behind and be at a disadvantage. For example, numerous students decided to bypass university and went straight into job markets although the work is beneath their capabilities and does not offer promised prospects.
To sum up, it is undeniable that taking a one-year break from high school enables students to revitalize themselves and learn new skills. However, they will waste time if not having clear goals and therefore be daunted when starting a new term at university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | Uyeen | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Nguyen Lan Chi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 78
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time What are the advantgages and disadvantages of this trend 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98966408269 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70974311882 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560723514212 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9658767256 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226314703151 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626757164502 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378556106647 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124390109455 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404676377584 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98966408269 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70974311882 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560723514212 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9658767256 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226314703151 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626757164502 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378556106647 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124390109455 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404676377584 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.